Local Evidence and Geometric Readout Repair in Trained GNNs
Quick summary
arXiv:2609.27092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many node-classification GNNs apply a linear classifier to a nonnegative mixture of local messages. An error can reflect either poor mixture weights or a reachable logit set poorly positioned for the classifier. We separate these causes with an exact-mass linear program and two learned post-hoc repairs. Every reweighted prediction has an equivalent centered logit translation, but only translations in a message-induced displacement set are realizable by reweighting. Across eight datasets, eight GNN backbones, and ten splits, mean accuracy rises
Key takeaways
- arXiv:2609.27092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many node-classification GNNs apply a linear classifier to a nonnegative mixture of local messages.
- An error can reflect either poor mixture weights or a reachable logit set poorly positioned for the classifier.
- We separate these causes with an exact-mass linear program and two learned post-hoc repairs.
Why it matters
The importance of “Local Evidence and Geometric Readout Repair in Trained GNNs” will be measured by what changes in practice. User behavior, access conditions, verifiable performance and responsible-use outcomes are the signals worth following.

Member comments