The Effective Depth Paradox: Topology and Trainability in Deep CNNs
Quick summary
arXiv:2602.13298v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents a controlled comparative study of convolutional neural network (CNN) topology and image classification performance across the architectural families VGG, ResNet, and GoogLeNet, evaluated on CIFAR-10 under a unified training protocol. We formalize the distinction between nominal depth ($D_{\mathrm{nom}}$), the physical count of weight-bearing layers, and effective depth ($D_{\mathrm{eff}}$), an operational metric quantifying the expected length of forward information paths, extending the path-ensemble interpretation o
Key takeaways
- arXiv:2602.13298v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents a controlled comparative study of convolutional neural network (CNN) topology and image classification performance across the architectural families VGG, ResNet, and GoogLeNet, evaluated on CIFAR-10 under a unified training protocol.
- We formalize the distinction between nominal depth ($D_{\mathrm{nom}}$), the physical count of weight-bearing layers, and effective depth ($D_{\mathrm{eff}}$), an operational metric quantifying the expected length of forward information paths, extending the path-ensemble interpretation o
Why it matters
The value of this work lies as much in how it was tested as in the claim itself. Sample design, baselines, uncertainty and replication help separate a laboratory result from real-world impact.
Member comments