Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy
Quick summary
arXiv:2604.03058v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLMs can be socially sycophantic, affirming users when they ask questions like "am I in the wrong?" rather than providing genuine assessment. We hypothesize that this behavior arises from LLMs' incorrect assumptions about the user, like underestimating how often users are seeking information over reassurance. We present Verbalized Assumptions, a framework for eliciting these assumptions from LLMs. Verbalized Assumptions provide insight into LLM sycophancy, delusion, and other safety issues: in social sycophancy datasets, "seeking valida
Key takeaways
- arXiv:2604.03058v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLMs can be socially sycophantic, affirming users when they ask questions like "am I in the wrong?" rather than providing genuine assessment.
- We hypothesize that this behavior arises from LLMs' incorrect assumptions about the user, like underestimating how often users are seeking information over reassurance.
- We present Verbalized Assumptions, a framework for eliciting these assumptions from LLMs.
Why it matters
“Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy” shows why AI risk cannot be reduced to answer accuracy. Access controls, logging, human approval and incident response need to be designed into the workflow from the start.
Member comments