Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making
Quick summary
arXiv:2603.19042v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into judicial decision making -- particularly in pretrial, sentencing, and parole contexts -- has generated a substantial and rapidly growing literature. Across computer science, economics, law, criminology, and psychology, researchers have examined the reliability, fairness, and real-world effects of AI-assisted decision making. Yet this literature remains fragmented, and differences in assumptions, concepts, and research priorities make it difficult to assess what is actually known. Using crim
Key takeaways
- arXiv:2603.19042v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into judicial decision making -- particularly in pretrial, sentencing, and parole contexts -- has generated a substantial and rapidly growing literature.
- Across computer science, economics, law, criminology, and psychology, researchers have examined the reliability, fairness, and real-world effects of AI-assisted decision making.
- Yet this literature remains fragmented, and differences in assumptions, concepts, and research priorities make it difficult to assess what is actually known.
Why it matters
The significance is not only the legal text but how it changes product design. Decisions around “Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making” may reshape data collection, model training, output accountability and market access.
Member comments