Planning or Learning: Reliability and Cost in Multi-Asset Maintenance
Quick summary
arXiv:2609.13566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial maintenance systems involve multiple interacting assets and shared resources, making it challenging to balance reliability and operational cost using a single decision framework. While recent work has focused on reinforcement learning (RL) for maintenance scheduling, direct comparisons with planning approaches under identical settings remain limited. In this work, we empirically compare planning and RL for multi-asset bearing maintenance using run-to-failure data. We examine how these methods behave when balancing preventive maintenanc
Key takeaways
- arXiv:2609.13566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial maintenance systems involve multiple interacting assets and shared resources, making it challenging to balance reliability and operational cost using a single decision framework.
- While recent work has focused on reinforcement learning (RL) for maintenance scheduling, direct comparisons with planning approaches under identical settings remain limited.
- In this work, we empirically compare planning and RL for multi-asset bearing maintenance using run-to-failure data.
Why it matters
The importance of “Planning or Learning: Reliability and Cost in Multi-Asset Maintenance” will be measured by what changes in practice. User behavior, access conditions, verifiable performance and responsible-use outcomes are the signals worth following.

Member comments